Trends in retirement and retirement income choices by TIAA participants: 2000–2018
-
Published:2023-05-10
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1-22
-
ISSN:1474-7472
-
Container-title:Journal of Pension Economics and Finance
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Journal of Pension Economics and Finance
Author:
Brown Jeffrey R.,Poterba James M.,Richardson David P.
Abstract
Abstract
This paper documents trends over the last two decades in retirement behavior and retirement income choices of participants in TIAA, a large and mature defined contribution plan. From 2000 and 2018, the average age at which TIAA participants stopped contributing to their accounts, which is a lower bound on their retirement age, rose by 1.2 years for female and 2.0 years for male participants. There is considerable variation in the elapsed time between the time of the last contribution to and the first income draw from plan accounts. Only 40% of participants take an initial income payment within 48 months of their last contribution. Later retirement and lags between retirement and the first retirement income payout led to a growing fraction of participants reaching the required minimum distribution (RMD) age before starting income draws. Between 2000 and 2018, the fraction of first-time income recipients who took no income until their RMD rose from 10% to 52%, while the fraction of these recipients who selected a life-contingent annuitized payout stream declined from 61% to 18%. Among those who began receiving income before age 70, annuitization rates were significantly higher than among those who did so at older ages. Aggregating across all income-receiving beneficiaries at TIAA, not just new income recipients, the proportion with a life annuity as part of their payout strategy fell from 52% in 2008 to 31% in 2018. By comparison, the proportion of all income recipients taking an RMD payment rose from 16% to 29%. About one-fifth of retirees received more than one type of income; the most common pairing was an RMD and a life annuity. In the later years of our sample, the RMD was becoming the de facto default distribution option for newly retired TIAA participants.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Economics and Econometrics,Finance
Reference16 articles.
1. Life Insurance Marketing Research Association (LIMRA) (2019) US Individual Annuity Yearbook–2018, Part 2.
2. Do Required Minimum Distribution Rules Matter? The Effect of the 2009 Holiday on Retirement Plan Distributions
3. The role of IRAs in US households’ saving for retirement, 2020;Holden;ICI Research Perspective,2021
4. U.S. Internal Revenue Service (2019) Retirement Plan and IRA Required Minimum Distribution FAQs. Available at https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/retirement-plans-faqs-regarding-required-minimum-distributions.