Abstract
If states are permitted to create and maintain a military force, by what means are they permitted to do so? This article argues that a theory of just recruitment should incorporate a concern for moral risk. Since the military is a morally risky profession for its members, recruitment policies should be evaluated in terms of how they distribute moral risk within a community. We show how common military recruitment practices exacerbate and concentrate moral risk exposure, using the UK as a case study. We argue that the British state wrongs its citizens by subjecting them to excessively morally risky recruitment practices. Since, we argue, this risk exposure cannot be justified by appealing to the benefits of a military career for recruits, our argument calls for reform of existing practices. Our method of evaluation is generalizable and therefore can be used to assess other states’ practices.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference106 articles.
1. Patriotism in Schools
2. The legitimacy of the military, private military and security companies, and just war theory
3. The Crime of Aggression, Humanity, and the Soldier
4. Ethics, Security, and The War-Machine
5. Francois, Mark . 2017. “Filling the Ranks. A Report for the Prime Minister on the State of Recruiting into the United Kingdom Armed Forces.” https://www.markfrancois.com/sites/www.markfrancois.com/files/2017-09/Filling%20the%20Ranks%20-%20Report%20on%20the%20State%20of%20Recruiting%20into%20the%20United%20Kingdom%20Armed%20Forces%20-%20by%20the%20Rt%20Hon%20Mark%20Francois%20MP%2026.07.17.pdf.