Abstract
We develop State Legislative Effectiveness Scores (SLES) for state legislators across 97 legislative chambers over recent decades, based on the number of bills that they sponsor, how far those bills move through the lawmaking process, and their substantive importance. We assess the scores through criterion and construct validation and reveal new insights into effective lawmaking across legislators. We then offer two illustrations of the immense opportunities that these scores provide for new scholarship on legislative behavior. First, we demonstrate greater majority-party influence over lawmaking in states featuring ideological polarization and majority-party cohesion, and where there is greater electoral competition for chamber control. Second, we show how institutional design choices—from legislative rules to the scope of professionalization—affect the distributions of policymaking power from state to state.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference81 articles.
1. The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947–96;Binder;American Political Science Review,1999
2. Explaining Legislative Leadership Influence: Simple Collective Action or Conditional Explanations?;Mooney;Political Research Quarterly,2012
3. Party Competition and Conflict in State Legislatures;Hinchliffe;State Politics and Policy Quarterly,2016
4. Determinants and Outcomes of State Legislative Effectiveness;Weissert;Social Science Quarterly,1991b
5. Legislative Professionalism and the Power of State House Leaders;Clucas;State Politics and Policy Quarterly,2007
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献