Abstract
The role played by the concept of legitimate expectations within administrative law has been the subject of much comment in recent years. The object of the present article is not to provide a general overview of the topic. My own views on this matter have been set out on an earlier occasion. The aim of this article is to focus more closely upon the extent to which legitimate expectations can have a substantive as well as a procedural dimension.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference14 articles.
1. Forsyth C. "The Provenance and Protection of Legitimate Expectations" [1988] C.L.J. 238
2. R. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, exp. Ruddock [1987] 1 W.L.R. 1482.
3. The example has obvious similarities to R. v. Secretary of Stale for Health, ex p. US Tobacco International Inc. [1992] Q.B. 353.
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Sosyal Güvenlik Hukukunda "Haklı Beklentiler"in Korunması Sorunu;Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi;2024-07-30
2. Good Governance, Rights and State: Quo Vadis Administrative Law?;Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi;2022-12-30
3. Zasada ochrony uzasadnionych oczekiwań. Refleksje na gruncie prawa podatkowego;Kwartalnik Prawa Podatkowego;2022-08-16
4. Legal Certainty;Legal Certainty and Central Bank Autonomy in Latin American Emerging Markets;2021
5. Do we need a theory of legitimate expectations?;Legal Studies;2020-01-20