Author:
Tulum Öner,Andreoni Antonio,Lazonick William
Abstract
The tension between innovation and financialisation is central to the business corporation. Innovation entails a 'retain-and-reinvest' allocation regime that can form a foundation for stable and equitable economic growth. Driven by shareholder-value ideology, financialisation entails a shift to 'downsize-and-distribute'. This Element investigates this tension in global pharmaceuticals, focusing on the two leading UK companies AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline. In the 2000s both adopted US-style governance, including stock buybacks and stock-based executive pay. Over the past decade, however, first AstraZeneca and then GlaxoSmithKline transitioned to innovation. Critical was the cessation of buybacks to refocus capabilities on investing in an innovative drugs pipeline. Enabling this shift were UK corporate-governance institutions that mitigated US-style shareholder-value maximisation. Reinventing capitalism for the sake of stable and equitable economic growth means eliminating value destruction caused by financialisation and supporting value creation through collective and cumulative innovation. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Reference113 articles.
1. An audience with Hal Barron: News and analysis;Mullard;Nature Reviews Drug Discovery,2019
2. Lazonick, W. , 2014a. ‘Profits without prosperity: Stock buybacks manipulate the market and leave most Americans worse off’, Harvard Business Review, September, https://hbr.org/2014/09/profits-without-prosperity.
3. Capabilities and capital investment: New perspectives on capital budgeting;Baldwin;Journal of Applied Corporate Finance,1992
4. Restructuring and innovation in pharmaceuticals and biotechs: The impact of financialisation
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献