Author:
Castillo-Riquelme Marianela C.,Lord Joanne,Moseley Merrick J.,Fielder Alistair R.,Haines Linda
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the cost-effectiveness of alternative methods of screening for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in the United Kingdom, including the existing method of indirect ophthalmoscopy by ophthalmologists and digital photographic screening by nurses.Methods: A decision tree model was used to compare five screening modalities for the UK population of preterm babies, using a health service perspective. Data were taken from published sources, observation at a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and expert judgment.Results: We estimated that use of standard digital cameras by nurses in NICUs would cost more than current methods (£371 compared with £321 per baby screened). However, a specialist nurse visiting units with a portable camera would be cheaper (£172 per baby). These estimates rely on nurses capturing and interpreting the images, with suitable training and supervision. Alternatively, nurses could capture the images then transmit them to a central unit for interpretation by ophthalmologists, although we estimate that this would be rather more expensive (£390 and £201, respectively, for NICU and visiting nurses). Sensitivity analysis was used to examine the robustness of estimates.Conclusions: It is likely that there is an opportunity to improve the efficiency of the ROP screening program. We estimate that screening by specialist nurses trained in image capture and interpretation using portable digital cameras is a cost-effective alternative to the current program of direct visualization by ophthalmologists. This option would require the development of a suitable portable machine. Direct comparative research is strongly needed to establish the accuracy of the various screening options.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference42 articles.
1. Ng EY , Connolly BP , McNamara JA , et al.2002 A comparison of laser photocoagulation with cryotherapy for threshold retinopathy of prematurity at 10 years. I. Visual function and structural outcome.Ophthalmology.109:928–934.
2. Lorenz B , Bock M , Muller HM , et al.1999 Telemedicine based screening of infants at risk for retinopathy of prematurity.Stud Health Technol Inform.64:155–163.
3. Flynn JT .2002 Comparison of laser and cryotherapy for ROP, discussion.Ophthalmology.109:935.
4. Swanson C , Cocker KD , Parker KH , et al.Semi-automated computer analysis of vessel growth in preterm infants without and with ROP.Submitted.
5. Schwartz SD , Harrison SA , Ferrone PJ , et al.2000 Telemedical evaluation and management of retinopathy of prematurity using a fiberoptic digital fundus camera.Ophthalmology.107:25–28.
Cited by
60 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献