Abstract
In Bugis-Makassar society a king was identified in terms of his function in assuring the spiritual and material well-being of the whole community. Though distinguished from the rest of the population by the paraphernalia and “white blood” of kingship, the individual ruler did not reign in splendid isolation from the people. He was a visible presence whose active participation in the affairs of the community was an expected norm. On one level, he was regarded as an essential intermediary or link between mankind on this earth and the gods (or God) of the Upperworld; and, on another level, he was seen as an instrument of the people in maintaining the adat, or the laws and customs of the land. These two variant but co-existing beliefs in the role of kings reflect an existing tension between the rulers and the adat guardians, which had its roots at the very inception of kingship in this society.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference90 articles.
1. The Nature of Kingship in Bone;Andaya;Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society,1975
2. Sedjarah Ringkas dari Orang2 Melaju di Makasar (Sulawesi Selatan);Patunru;Bingkisan,1967
3. De Europeers in den Maleischen Archipel;Tiele;Bijdragen vanhet Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land-en Volkenkunde (BKI),1881
4. Bijdragen tot de kennis der residentie Ternate
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献