Abstract
Any predictions that solicitors acting for divorcing parents might become
redundant, as increasing use is made of mediation services, are unsubstantiated
by the research on which this article is based. This study shows
how solicitors, far from retreating from issues of arrangements over the
future of children of divorcing parents, are busy adapting themselves to
the new working environment. For some this process involves themselves
qualifying as mediators. For these and others, it entails acquiring and
presenting to their clients an understanding of ‘child psychology’ which
enables them to advise their clients on how to sort out their differences
in ways that will safeguard their children's welfare. By constructing
children's welfare within a legal discourse of justice and protection of
their clients' lawful interests, solicitors are able to convince themselves
that justice, in cases involving children's welfare, is achieved by persuading
their clients to ‘be sensible’ and sort out their differences, and that
those parents who are openly hostile and/or pursue their own (selfish)
interests have lost sight of justice and need to be brought back into line.
The article demonstrates how solicitors claim to achieve these ends and
raises questions about their practical and theoretical implications.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献