Abstract
In discussions of the underrepresentation of women in professional philosophy, those sceptical of discrimination as an explanation often suggest that gender differences in interests are a plausible alternative hypothesis. Some suspect that if women’s differing interests explains underrepresentation, then interventions suggested by the discrimination hypothesis might be unnecessary—or even risky. I argue that one needs to consider how stereotypes might influence interests, and that doing so can provide a more even-handed assessment of the risks involved in proposed interventions.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference80 articles.
1. “Why Do Women Leave Philosophy? Surveying Students at the Introductory Level.”;Thompson;Philosopher’s Imprint,2016
2. A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement.
3. Explanations of the gender gap in philosophy
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献