Abstract
SummaryThat experimental design is fundamentally more important than the formal analysis of variance of results is emphasized. Attention is drawn to the many weaknesses of split plot designs, and the case for adopting other types of confounding whenever possible is stated. Split plots are sometimes necessary but rarely desirable. The need for randomization is stressed, with a warning against abandoning this principle before fully considering the dangers. The error in analysing repeated observations as though they are from split plots is discussed at length. After brief comment on variance heterogeneity, a final section looks at how measures of the precision of treatment means should be presented. The two main points made are that standard errors of treatment means should always be included in tables of results, and that existing multiple range significance test procedures have little or no practical utility.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献