Abstract
AbstractThe share of basic services that NGOs deliver has grown dramatically in developing countries due to increased receipt of aid and philanthropy in these countries. Many scholars and practitioners worry that NGOs reduce reliance on government services and, in turn, lower demand for government provision and undermine political engagement. Others argue that NGOs prop-up poorly performing governments that receive undeserved credit for the production, allocation, or welfare effects of NGO services. Using original surveys and a randomized health intervention, implemented in parallel to a similar universal government program, this article investigates the long-term effect of NGO provision on political attitudes and behavior. Access to NGO services increased preferences for NGO, relative to government, provision. However, political engagement and perceptions of government legitimacy were unaffected. Instead, the intervention generated political credit for the incumbent president. This study finds that citizens see NGOs as a resource that powerful government actors control, and they reward actors who they see as responsible for allocation of those resources.
Funder
United States National Science Foundation
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference69 articles.
1. Democracy Does Cause Growth
2. The Origins of Voluntary Compliance: Attitudes toward Taxation in Urban Nigeria
3. Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials
4. When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change
5. Burnett, Maria . 2012. “Curtailing Criticism: Intimidation and Obstruction of Civil Society in Uganda.” New York, N.Y.: Human Rights Watch. August 21. At https://web.archive.org/web/20210211040818/https://www.hrw.org/report/2012/08/21/curtailing-criticism/intimidation-and-obstruction-civil-society-uganda.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献