Author:
Roop Sterling,Tronvoll Kjetil,Minde Nicodemus
Abstract
AbstractThe popularity of unity governments to settle both internal political divisions and outright conflict has grown in the last 20 years. However, more often than not unity governments fail to mitigate the political dynamics baked into the political economies and suffer from being insufficiently anchored in local society. The Government of National Unity (GNU) in Zanzibar, formed in 2010 as the culmination of the ‘maridhiano’ political reconciliation process and following numerous attempts at reconciliation led to initial successes, is a case in point. Zanzibar's GNU turned out to be ‘position’ rather than ‘power’ sharing, constitutionalised through a hybrid format of the politics of continuity and collusion. As such the position sharing system broke down when voters in the 2015 election sought neither continuity nor collusion, but transformational change of governance. This was in turn blocked by veto actors in favour of continuity, resulting in the collapse and discontinuation of the GNU in Zanzibar.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference35 articles.
1. Power-sharing in comparative perspective: the dynamics of ‘unity government’ in Kenya and Zimbabwe
2. Zanzibar Revolutionary Government (ZRG). 2013. Zanzibar House of Representatives Ripoti Ya Kamati Teule Ya Baraza La Wawakilishi Iliyoundwa Kuchunguza Migogoro Ya Ardhi Zanzibar.
3. Zanzibar Revolutionary Government (ZRG). 2012. Special Committee Report on issues raised in the 2011/2012 Budget Session, April. Zanzibar House of Representatives.
4. Zanzibar Revolutionary Government (ZRG). 2010b. Zanzibar House of Representatives Hansard, 29.1.2010. Zanzibar House of Representatives.
5. Bridging Divided Identities – or an Agency of Political Domination? Reassessing the Future of the Tanzanian Union
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献