Mixed-method examination of factors associated with adolescent decision-making and involvement in care in the context of advanced cancer

Author:

Sutherland-Foggio MalcolmORCID,Olsavsky Anna L.,Skeens Micah A.,Nahata Leena,Hill Kylie,Schaefer MeganORCID,Himelhoch Alexandra,Kenney Ansley E.ORCID,Humphrey Lisa,Olshefski Randal,Gerhardt Cynthia A.ORCID

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Adolescents with cancer often experience significant symptom burden and aggressive treatment near end-of-life. Increased adolescent involvement in care and decision-making may benefit health outcomes. Limited research has examined factors associated with adolescents’ involvement in care in the context of advanced disease. Thus, we examined the impact of background factors and decision-making perceptions on both adolescents’ involvement in care and their desired change in involvement. Methods Adolescents with advanced cancer (<60% survival or refractory/relapsed disease), ages 10–23 (n = 41; Mage = 15.37), were recruited approximately 1 month after diagnosis to complete measures of decision-making perceptions and their family role. Hierarchical regressions examined the contributions of background factors and decision-making perceptions to adolescents’ frequency and desired involvement in their care. Qualitative interviews regarding decision-making were analyzed using deductive analysis. Results The model examining frequency of involvement in care was significant, F(5,34) = 3.12, p = .02, R2= .31. Older age was the only significant predictor (β = .13, p= .003). The model examining desired involvement was non-significant, F(5,34) = 2.22, p = .075. Qualitative analysis indicated that (1) older adolescents have more involvement in decision-making, (2) collaborative decision-making occurred between the adolescent and extended family, and (3) adolescents trusted others to make decisions. Integration of qualitative and quantitative data revealed congruence in findings. Significance of results Adolescents with advanced cancer, who consider how decisions directly impact them and prefer greater autonomy, may be more involved in their medical care. Research is needed to identify other longitudinal predictors of decision-making and involvement in care. Providers should consider encouraging families to communicate their preferences and engage in shared decision-making.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Reference36 articles.

1. Adolescent and family development: Autonomy and identity in the digital age;Shifflet-Chila;Children and Youth Services Review,2016

2. Comparison of child self-report and parent proxy-report of symptoms: Results from a longitudinal symptom assessment study of children with advanced cancer;Montgomery;Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing,2020

3. Pediatric palliative care in childhood cancer nursing: From diagnosis to cure or end of life;Foster;Seminars in Oncology Nursing,2010

4. Identification of adolescents and young adults’ preferences and priorities for future cancer treatment using a novel decision-making tool;Snaman;Pediatric Blood and Cancer,2021a

5. Current understanding of decision-making in adolescents with cancer: A narrative systematic review;Day;Palliative Medicine,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3