Abstract
Abstract
Research has shown that long-term care (LTC) volunteers play important roles in enhancing the quality of life (QoL) of older LTC residents, often through providing unique forms of relational care. Guided by Kane’s QoL domains, we used a modified objective hermeneutics method to analyze how unique volunteer roles are represented and supported in provincial policies in Alberta, British Columbia, Ontario, and Nova Scotia. We found that policies define volunteer roles narrowly, which may limit residents’ QoL. This happens through (1) omitting volunteers from most regulatory policy, (2) likening volunteers to supplementary staff rather than to caregivers with unique roles, and (3) overemphasizing residents’ safety, security, and order. We offer insights into promising provincial policy directions for LTC volunteers, yet we argue that further regulating volunteers may be an inadequate or ill-suited approach to addressing the cultural, social, and structural changes required for volunteers to enhance LTC residents’ QoL effectively.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology,Community and Home Care,Gerontology,Health (social science)
Reference69 articles.
1. Professionalization of hospice volunteer practices: What are the
implications?
2. Centring Care: Explaining Regulatory Tensions in Residential Care for Older Persons
3. Nova Scotia Health and Wellness. (2016). Long term care program requirements: Nursing homes & residential care facilities. Retrieved 9 February 2018 from https://novascotia.ca/dhw/ccs/policies/Long-Term-Care-Facility-Program-Requirements.pdf.
4. Accreditation Canada. (2016). Residential homes for seniors standards. Retrieved 17 April 2021 from https://store.accreditation.ca/products/residential-homes-for-seniors.
5. Challenges in the coordination of volunteer activities in long-term care services
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献