Abstract
AbstractSince the 1980s, and mainly since the 1990s, studies in politics and law have adopted an economic attitude to explaining judicial behaviour. In contrast, this paper follows the individualistic approach by focusing on the role of individuals in bureaucracies in designing policy outcomes, using political entrepreneurship and new institutionalism as its theoretical framework. In describing a specific institutional change in Israel – the passage of the General Security Service Law in 2002 – I maintain that this institutional change is an equilibrium that resulted from the actions of empowered military bureaucrats acting as political entrepreneurs who sought to maximise their own political assets in the light of certain structural and cultural conditions, both local and international. The institutional arena was characterised by the inability of the government to function effectively (non-governability), enhanced judicialisation, the dominance of security issues in Israel, and the development of a unique shared mental model of alternative political culture. However, it was still open to changes based on new liberal attitudes about human rights. Thus, politicians influence and are influenced by a wide range of institutional norms and practices in a complex process of changes in institutional design.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference77 articles.
1. Political Entrepreneurship, Institutional Change, and American Political Development
2. Litigation as Consummatory Action: The Instrumental Paradigm Reconsidered;Shamir;Studies in Law, Politics and Society,1991
3. On Accessibility and Sensitivity: Political Consumerism, Social-Political Entrepreneurship and Social Justice in Israel;Shamir;Social Security,2013