Author:
Melville Angela,Laing Karen
Abstract
AbstractIn 2001, the Legal Services Commission (LSC) introduced a new pilot, the Family Advice and Information Network (FAInS), which recognised that family law clients typically face a cluster of legal and non-legal issues. Family lawyers involved in FAInS were encouraged to address a client’s legal problems, and then refer the client to other services for assistance with non-legal issues. In this way, family law clients were to be offered a holistic service, with the lawyer acting as a ‘case manager’ who helped match services to their client’s individual needs. This article presents data drawn from an evaluation of FAInS, and shows that lawyers did not regularly refer their clients to other services, with referrals largely being limited to mediation. We conclude that family lawyers are not necessarily the most appropriate gatekeepers, and propose a number of alternatives for providing a multi-agency approach to resolving family law issues.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference54 articles.
1. The future public funding of family dispute resolution services
2. Resolution (2008) ‘About us’, www.resolution.org.uk/editorial.asp?page_id=16, accessed 25 September 2008.
3. Hynes S. (2007) Is There Life after CLACs. Law Centres Federation, www.lawcentres.org.uk/uploads/Is_there_life_after_CLACS_Feb_07.pdf, accessed 13 January 2008.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献