The clinical usefulness of guideline-based strategies with and without the role of nonspecific symptoms to predict urinary tract infections in nursing homes: a decision curve analysis

Author:

Kuil SachaORCID,de Jong MennoORCID,Schneeberger Caroline,van Leth FrankORCID

Abstract

Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical value of urinary tract infections (UTIs) guideline algorithms and the role of nonspecific symptoms to support clinical decision-making in nursing home residents. Design: In a preplanned secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study including nursing home residents with a presumed UTI, 2 prediction models were used in a decision curve analysis (DCA): (1) guideline-based and (2) extended: nonspecific symptom(s) added to the guideline model. The stringent outcome definition for “true UTIs” included symptom improvement during adequate antimicrobial therapy, based on susceptibility test results. The outcome of a DCA is the Net Benefit to quantify the performance of the prediction models, visualized in a decision curve. Setting: Dutch nursing homes (n = 13). Patients: Nursing home residents with a presumed UTI. Results: Of the 180 residents with a presumed UTI, 43 fulfilled the definition of “true UTI” (23.9%). The Net Benefit of the guideline-based model was low and the corresponding threshold range was small (21%–28%). The extended model improved the prediction of UTIs. However, the clinical usefulness of the extended model was still limited to a small threshold range (10%–28%). Conclusions: The clinical usefulness of the current guideline-based algorithm to diagnose UTI in nursing home residents seems limited, and adding nonspecific symptoms does not further improve decision-making due to the small threshold probability. Given the poor performance of the guideline-based model, refinement of the guidelines may be required. Trial registry: Dutch trial registry: NTR6467; date of first registration, 25/05/2017.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3