Author:
Almeida Felipe,Cavalieri Marco
Abstract
Clarence Ayres was a strong dissenting voice in US economics during the twentieth century. In the 1930s, a debate between Ayres and Frank Knight was published by the International Journal of Ethics. Although the debate focused on ethics, the evolution of economics was also discussed. This paper proposes an understanding of Ayres’s ideas based on the context in which he made them. This context is defined by the 1930s Ayres-Knight debate and the archival correspondence between Ayres and Knight during the 1930s.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Arts and Humanities
Reference47 articles.
1. Moral Confusion in Economics
2. Rutherford, Malcolm . 2001. “Walton Hamilton, Amherst, and the Brookings Graduate School: Institutional Economics and Education.” Department Discussion Papers 0104, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
3. Confusion Thrice Confounded
4. The Knight-Ayres Correspondence: The Grounds of Knowledge and Social Action
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献