Abstract
The problem of the enumeration of the different arrangements of n letters in an n × n Latin square, that is, in a square in which each letter appears once in every row and once in every column, was first discussed by Euler(1). A complete algebraic solution has been given by MacMahon(3) in two forms, both of which involve the action of differential operators on an expanded operand. If MacMahon's algebraic apparatus be actually put into operation, it will be found that different terms are written down, corresponding to all the different ways in which each row of the square could conceivably be filled up, that those arrangements which conflict with the conditions of the Latin square are ultimately obliterated, and those which conform to these conditions survive the final operation and each contribute unity to the result. The manipulation of the algebraic expressions, therefore, is considerably more laborious than the direct enumeration of the possible squares by a systematic and exhaustive series of trials. It is probably this circumstance which has introduced inaccuracies into the numbers of 5 × 5 and 6 × 6 Latin squares published in the literature.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
56 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Where drivers are looking at during takeover: Implications for safe takeovers during conditionally automated driving;Traffic Injury Prevention;2023-06-22
2. A direct proof of the non-existence of a MOL(6);Journal of Geometry;2023-03-18
3. Feldversuchswesen;Angewandte Statistik mit R für Agrarwissenschaften;2023
4. Latin Squares at Rothamsted in the Time of Fisher and Yates;Annals of the Canadian Society for History and Philosophy of Mathematics/ Société canadienne d’histoire et de philosophie des mathématiques;2022-11-14
5. The geometric reason for the non-existence of a MOL(6);Beiträge zur Algebra und Geometrie / Contributions to Algebra and Geometry;2022-01-07