Author:
Tumusiime Emmanuel,B. Wade Brorsen,Mosali Jagadeesh,Johnson Jim,Locke James,Biermacher Jon T.
Abstract
The parameters of yield response functions can vary by year. Past studies usually assume yield functions are nonstochastic or “limited” stochastic. In this study, we estimate rye–ryegrass yield functions in which all parameters are random. The three functional forms considered are the linear response plateau, the quadratic, and the Spillman-Mitscherlich. Nonstochastic yield models are rejected in favor of stochastic parameter models. Quadratic functional forms fit the data poorly. Optimal nitrogen application recommendations are calculated for the linear response plateau and Spillman-Mitscherlich. The stochastic models lead to smaller recommended levels of nitrogen, but the economic benefits of using fully stochastic crop yield functions are small because expected profit functions are relatively flat for the stochastic yield functions. Stochastic crop yield functions provide a way of incorporating production, uncertainty into input decisions.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference36 articles.
1. A new look at the statistical model identification
2. Avon Liebig Model for Water and Nitrogen Crop Response;Grimm;Western Journal of Agricultural Economics,1987
3. Several Tests for Model Specification in the Presence of Alternative Hypotheses
4. Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses
5. Approximations to the Log-likelihood Function in the Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Model;Pinheiro;Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics,1995
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献