1. For example, C.P. Symonds, op. cit. (note 6), 71; William A. Brend, ‘Differential Diagnosis of Contusion of the Brain and Psychoneurosis’, British Medical Journal, 1, 4197 (1941), 885. I take the phrase ‘dumping ground’ from Ian Skottowe, ‘The Dumping Ground of Neurasthenia’, The Lancet, 215, 5550 (1930), 106.
2. As medical officers compiling patient-records were warned: ‘Subjective and objective data should not be mixed up either.’ See the untitled, unauthored and undated document contained in TNA, WO 222/845. The topicality of this document would suggest that it was written by Symonds.
3. For more general comments on how databases are founded, and what problems this can create when the object of study does not yield to the planned system of classification, see Christine Hine, ‘Databases as Scientific Instruments and Their Role in the Ordering of Scientific Work’, Social Studies of Science, 36, 2 (2006), 278 and passim.
4. See G.F. Rowbotham, ‘The Long-Term Results of Injuries of the Head (A Medical, Economical and Sociological Survey)’, British Journal of Psychiatry, 95, 399 (1949), 339 and passim. Indeed, many neurologists expressed disappointment that no one objective method could diagnose concussive sequelae, eg. see the comments in Symonds, op. cit. (note 5), 326.
5. An Address on the Management of Head Injuries;Trotter;The Lancet,1925