Abstract
In the first half of the nineteenth century, when the Barbary corsairs were finally laid low, a great impetus was given to North African research, and numerous scholars visited and wrote about Carthage. Valiant efforts were made at that time to correlate the statements of ancient authors, chiefly Appian, Diodorus, Justin, Polybius, and Strabo, both with each other and with the existing topography of the peninsula, but the theories propounded had usually little virtue save that of originality and imagination. If excavation was undertaken at all (as it was by Davis, for instance, and Beulé), Roman buildings were often mistaken for Punic, so that elaborate plans of Carthage like Davis's2—to mention but one—are no longer of much consequence.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Arts and Humanities,Classics
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The Physical Environment of Underwater Cultural Heritage;International Law of Underwater Cultural Heritage;2022
2. Like I need a hole in the head: supernumerary external auditory meatus in a Carthaginian cranium;International Journal of Osteoarchaeology;2009
3. BIBLIOGRAPHY;The Cambridge Ancient History;1990-03-29
4. Chronological Table;The Cambridge Ancient History;1990-03-29
5. Appendix;The Cambridge Ancient History;1990-03-29