Abstract
Abstract
This Article deals with selected issues of judicial protection that arise in the context of the sanctions adopted by the EU against Russia and Belarus after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. As most cases challenging the sanctions are pending, this Article draws lessons from the previous case law on EU restrictive measures. It explores what aspects of the sanctions escape judicial review, then profiles of external (or formal) legality of the sanctions, of internal (or substantive) legality, and concludes by assessing the overall role of the Court in EU foreign affairs. The discussion shows that the case law in this area of EU administrative law converges to a great extent with other areas of EU competence, but tensions remain in how the Court may impose substantial constraints to executive discretion in the field of Common Foreign and Security Policy.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference27 articles.
1. Judicial Review in the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy;Koutrakos;International and Comparative Law Quarterly,2018
2. Les sanctions de l'Union européenne adoptées en réaction à la guerre en Ukraine: Défis et enjeux pour le contrôle juridictionnel des mesures restrictives;Challet;Revue des Affaires Européennes,2023
3. Censorship in the EU as a Result of the War in Ukraine. RT France v Council of the European Union;Lonardo;European Law Review,2023
4. Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献