Author:
King Gary,Honaker James,Joseph Anne,Scheve Kenneth
Abstract
We propose a remedy for the discrepancy between the way political scientists analyze data with missing values and the recommendations of the statistics community. Methodologists and statisticians agree that “multiple imputation” is a superior approach to the problem of missing data scattered through one’s explanatory and dependent variables than the methods currently used in applied data analysis. The discrepancy occurs because the computational algorithms used to apply the best multiple imputation models have been slow, difficult to implement, impossible to run with existing commercial statistical packages, and have demanded considerable expertise. We adapt an algorithm and use it to implement a general-purpose, multiple imputation model for missing data. This algorithm is considerably faster and easier to use than the leading method recommended in the statistics literature. We also quantify the risks of current missing data practices, illustrate how to use the new procedure, and evaluate this alternative through simulated data as well as actual empirical examples. Finally, we offer easy-to-use software that implements all methods discussed.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
1247 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Co-Evolution and Spatial Diffusion;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02
2. More Measurement Issues for Diffusion, Zones of Peace, and Network Effects;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02
3. Zones of Peace and Neighborhood Diffusion;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02
4. A Dyadic Perspective;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02
5. Measurement Issues;Piecing Together the Peaces;2024-10-02