A RESPONSE TO ERIK SCHOKKAERT ONMACROJUSTICE
-
Published:2009-03
Issue:1
Volume:25
Page:85-98
-
ISSN:0266-2671
-
Container-title:Economics and Philosophy
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Economics and Philosophy
Author:
Kolm Serge-Christophe
Abstract
Erik Schokkaert's note presents a very good summary of the theory of macrojustice and a very good list of the directions of research it points to. This is quite fitting since a research programme defines a paradigm, and he sees this proposal as a paradigm shift. This is also very appropriate since his own qualifications are the best for advancing fast in these research topics. I have only a very small number of qualifications to add to his presentation, but I prefer to begin with emphasizing the most important issues. Two aspects can be seen as the most important: the de facto axiomatic derivation of the solution ELIE and its application on the one hand, and the present state of scholarly studies of the optimum or just distribution of income on the other hand. Let us enter by the second door (as opposed to what is done in the bookMacrojustice). This will lead us to conclude with a more synthetic and broader view of the basic logic of the paradigms of justice and of the surprising recent history of their interpretations.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Philosophy
Reference37 articles.
1. Slemrod J. 2002. Tax systems. NBER Reporter. Summer 202: 633–55.
2. Monsieur tout-le-monde est post-welfariste;Schokkaert;Revue Economique,1999
3. Reply to Alexander and Musgrave
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. General Presentation;On Kolm's Theory of Macrojustice;2010-08-09
2. Why Should We Debate the Theory of Macrojustice?;On Kolm's Theory of Macrojustice;2010-08-09