Author:
Landers Richard N.,Behrend Tara S.
Abstract
In industrial-organizational (I-O) psychology, much like in the organizational sciences more broadly (Hambrick, 2007), we have a bit of an addiction to theoretical models. It is commonly assumed that developing new theory is the most valuable way to solve pressing research problems and to drive our field forward (Mathieu, 2016). However, this assumption is untested, and there is growing awareness among organizational scientists that this hardline approach, which is unusual among both the natural sciences and other social sciences, may even be damaging the reputation and influence of our field (Antonakis, 2017; Ones, Kaiser, Chamorro-Premuzic, & Svensson, 2017). As Hambrick (2007) describes, the requirement for theory first “takes an array of subtle, but significant, tolls on our field” (p. 1348). As we will describe in this article, Morelli, Potosky, Arthur, and Tippins’ (2017) suggestions, if taken at face value, will likely create such tolls by encouraging the creation of new theories of dubious value. To be clear, we agree with Morelli et al. that better theory is needed for technology's impact on I-O psychology broadly and talent assessment in particular. We disagree, however, that creating new technology theories using the approaches that I-O psychology typically employs is likely to accomplish this broader goal. Rather, it will ultimately only isolate research on I-O technologies even further from both mainstream I-O research and technology research. Given that we are already quite isolated, this would be a disastrous path.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Applied Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference18 articles.
1. Arthur W. Jr. , Keiser N. , & Doverspike D. (2017). An information processing-based conceptual framework of the effects of the use of Internet-based testing devices on scores on employment-related assessments and tests. Manuscript submitted for publication.
2. On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications
3. Raudenbush S. W. , Bryk A. S. , & Congdon R. (2013). HLM 7.01 for Windows [Computer software]. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
4. Does media affect learning: where are we now?
5. Ones D. S. , Kaiser R. B. , Chamorro-Premuzic T. , & Svensson C. (2017). Has industrial-organizational psychology lost its way? The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/tip/april17/lostio.aspx
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献