Abstract
Christopher Miles Coope offers a letter, drafted by Helen Taylor but certified by Mill, in which Mill asserts the duty to vote, as evidence that he could not have regarded harmfulness to others as a necessary condition of moral wrongness. But it is clear that Mill regarded the duty to vote as one of imperfect obligation, and the wrongness of not fulfilling it as a matter roughly of not doing enough, in this case not doing one's fair share. He has room for the common-sense harmlessness of staying at home. At the same time he grounds political duties in the harmfulness of neglecting the power of legislation and in the possibility, consistently maintained, that one can harm by inaction. Mill's view, central to his relation between morality and liberty, remains at work here, while also suggesting reflections on the peculiarity of his conception of harm.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Zarar İlkesi Üzerine: Üç Temel Eleştiriyi Tartışmak;Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi;2024-02-06
2. The Harm Principle and the Nature of Harm;Utilitas;2021-12-06
3. The Harm Principle;A Companion to Mill;2018-04-20
4. Mill’s Justice and Political Liberalism;Mill on Justice;2012
5. The Democratic Turnout ‘Problem’;Political Studies;2011-12-05