Abstract
Abstract
A central finding of bilingual research is that cognates – words that share semantic, phonological, and orthographic characteristics across languages – are processed faster than non-cognate words. However, it remains unclear whether cognate facilitation effects are reliant on identical cognates, or whether facilitation simply varies along a continuum of cross-language orthographic and phonological similarity. In two experiments, German–English bilinguals read identical cognates, close cognates, and non-cognates in a lexical decision task and a sentence-reading task while their eye movements were recorded. Participants read the stimuli in their L1 German and L2 English. Converging results found comparable facilitation effects of identical and close cognates vs. non-cognates. Cognate facilitation could be described as a continuous linear effect of cross-language orthographic similarity on lexical decision accuracy and latency, as well as fixation durations. Cross-language phonological similarity modulated the continuous orthographic similarity effect in single word recognition, but not in sentence processing.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Education
Reference97 articles.
1. dlexDB—eine lexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung;Heister;Psychologische Rundschau,2011
2. Lexical access and naming time;Forster;Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,1973
3. Executive control modulates cross-language lexical activation during L2 reading: evidence from eye movements;Pivneva;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,2014
4. R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, https://www.R-project.org/.
5. The cognate facilitation effect depends on the presence of identical cognates;Arana;Bilingualism: Language and Cognition,2022