Abstract
AbstractDo policymakers learn from the policy experiences of other governments, and if so, what do they learn? A long-established normative claim suggests that intergovernmental learning can and should occur among the US states, which serve as “laboratories of democracy” for the nation. We put this claim to a tough test, comparing the influences on the diffusion of instrumental Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP) laws with that of more symbolic abortion regulation, from 1993 to 2016. We find evidence of substantive intergovernmental learning in policy diffusion even for abortion regulation—but only for instrumental abortion regulation. On symbolic abortion policy, states appear to learn mainly political lessons. Furthermore, proponents and opponents appear to learn different lessons in these diffusions, with loss aversion motivating opponents especially highly. Our results suggest that policymakers have a sophisticated understanding of the differences among policies’ goals and act strategically in pursuit of those goals.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference103 articles.
1. Bottom-Up Federalism: The Diffusion of Anti-Smoking Policies from U.S. Cities to States;Shipan;American Journal of Political Science,2006
2. Galton’s Problem and the Role of Theory;Weinstein;Political Methodology,1981
3. Policy Diffusion: The Issue-Definition Stage;Gilardi;American Journal of Political Science,2021
4. The Supply-Side Economics of Abortion;Joyce;The New England Journal of Medicine,2011
5. Loss Aversion, Framing, and Bargaining: The Implications of Prospect Theory of International Conflict;Levy;International Political Science Review,1996
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献