Abstract
AbstractTheories that explain the power of legislative leaders have been developed for the U.S. Congress and lower chambers of state legislatures, but they have not been tested for state senates, even though senate leaders can be quite influential. Following Mooney (2013a), I develop a new numerical index score measuring the formal power of the top chamber-elected leader of each state senate from 1995 through 2010. I then use the data to test various hypotheses explaining variation in the power of legislative leaders. The results uncover partial evidence for conditional party government theory, but only for senates that elect their own president. When the lieutenant governor serves as senate president, senators do not perceive their top chamber-elected leader as an officer able to best carry out their ideological, electoral, or policy objectives. This underscores crucial differences between senate chambers that elect their own presidents and those that do not.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Reference54 articles.
1. Carey, John M. , Niemi, Richard G. , Powell, Lynda W. , and Moncrief, Gary . 2002. State Legislative Survey [Computer file]. ICPSR20960-vl. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2008-03-25.
2. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House
3. Electoral Competition in the American States
4. DeBlieu, Jan . 2012. “Coastal Sketch: Marc Basnight Rises to Power.” Coastal Review Online, February 14. https://www.coastalreview.org/2012/02/coastal-sketch-marc-basnight-rises-to-power/. Accessed June 11, 2020.
5. The Office of Lieutenant-Governor in the States