Paramedic Checklists do not Accurately Identify Post-ictal or Hypoglycaemic Patients Suitable for Discharge at the Scene

Author:

Tohira Hideo,Fatovich Daniel,Williams Teresa A.,Bremner Alexandra,Arendts Glenn,Rogers Ian R.,Celenza Antonio,Mountain David,Cameron Peter,Sprivulis Peter,Ahern Tony,Finn Judith

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and safety of two pre-defined checklists to identify prehospital post-ictal or hypoglycemic patients who could be discharged at the scene.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of lower acuity, adult patients attended by paramedics in 2013, and who were either post-ictal or hypoglycemic, was conducted. Two self-care pathway assessment checklists (one each for post-ictal and hypoglycemia) designed as clinical decision tools for paramedics to identify patients suitable for discharge at the scene were used. The intention of the checklists was to provide paramedics with justification to not transport a patient if all checklist criteria were met. Actual patient destination (emergency department [ED] or discharge at the scene) and subsequent events (eg, ambulance requests) were compared between patients who did and did not fulfill the checklists. The performance of the checklists against the destination determined by paramedics was also assessed.ResultsTotals of 629 post-ictal and 609 hypoglycemic patients were identified. Of these, 91 (14.5%) and 37 (6.1%) patients fulfilled the respective checklist. Among those who fulfilled the checklist, 25 (27.5%) post-ictal and 18 (48.6%) hypoglycemic patients were discharged at the scene, and 21 (23.1%) and seven (18.9%) were admitted to hospital after ED assessment. Amongst post-ictal patients, those fulfilling the checklist had more subsequent ambulance requests (P=.01) and ED attendances with seizure-related conditions (P=.04) within three days than those who did not. Amongst hypoglycemic patients, there were no significant differences in subsequent events between those who did and did not meet the criteria. Paramedics discharged five times more hypoglycemic patients at the scene than the checklist predicted with no significant differences in the rate of subsequent events. Four deaths (0.66%) occurred within seven days in the hypoglycemic cohort, and none of them were attributed directly to hypoglycemia.ConclusionsThe checklists did not accurately identify patients suitable for discharge at the scene within the Emergency Medical Service. Patients who fulfilled the post-ictal checklist made more subsequent health care service requests within three days than those who did not. Both checklists showed similar occurrence of subsequent events to paramedics’ decision, but the hypoglycemia checklist identified fewer patients who could be discharged at the scene than paramedics actually discharged. Reliance on these checklists may increase transportations to ED and delay initiation of appropriate treatment at a hospital.TohiraH, FatovichD, WilliamsTA, BremnerA, ArendtsG, RogersIR, CelenzaA, MountainD, CameronP, SprivulisP, AhernT, FinnJ. Paramedic checklists do not accurately identify post-ictal or hypoglycaemic patients suitable for discharge at the scene. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016;31(3):282293.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Emergency Nursing,Emergency Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Regional Population Growth, Australia, 2012-13. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Products/3218.0~2012-13~Main+Features~Western+Australia?OpenDocument. Accessed April 3, 2014.

2. Out-of-hospital Treatment of Hypoglycemia: Refusal of Transport and Patient Outcome

3. Western Australian Department of Health. National Emergency Access Target Quaterly Reports. http://www.health.wa.gov.au/emergencyaccessreform/home/monitoring.cfm. Accessed July 8, 2104.

4. Extended care paramedics (ECPs). http://www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/ 6e89ce8042ad6521b6e0be30a4818ec3/extcareparamedicsfacts-saas-200912.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=6e89ce8042ad6521b6e0be30a4818ec3&CACHE=NONE. Accessed May 22, 2013.

5. St John Ambulance Western Australia. 2012-13 Annunal Report. http://www.stjohnambulance.com.au/docs/corporate-publications/2011-12-annual-report.pdf?sfvrsn=0. Accessed July 16, 2014.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3