Abstract
Nocardial taxonomy, like that of other actinomyeete genera, has undergone all the viscissitudes of doubt associated with years of inadequate and sometimes inappropriate methodology. This is reflected by the great expansion of species names allocated to the genus over the first two thirds of this century (Buchanan, Holt & Lessel, 1966), followed by the contraction achieved in the list of approved bacterial names in 1980 (Skerman, McGowan & Sneath, 1980). Created by Trevisan in 1889 for five species, modern taxonomists would now allocate some 20 species to the genus, including only one of Trevisan's original five species (Table 1). As an actinomycetc genusNocardiahas suffered from two particular disadvantages. First in having an apparently distinctive nocardioform morphology on the basis of which organisms were referred to this genus long after crude morphology lost its importance in many other genera. Second in having an unfortunate type species,Nocardia farcinica, with no really well accredited type strain.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Immunology
Reference31 articles.
1. Examen des lipides d'une souche de Nocardia farcinica: présence d'acides mycoliques;Chamoiseau;Comptes Rendus hebdomadaires des Séances de I'Académic des sciences,1970
2. Free Mycolic Acids as Criteria in the Classification of Nocardia and the 'rhodochrous' Complex
3. The nomenelatural status of the generic names of the Actinomyeetales;Lessel;International Bulletin of bacterial Nomenclature and Taxonomy (supplement),1960
4. Antigenic structure of the actinomycetales. VII. Chemical and serological similarities of cell walls from 100 actinomycetales strains;Kwapinski;Journal of Bacteriology,1964
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献