Field experiments comparing the effects of muriate and sulphate of potash on potato yield and quality

Author:

Dickins J. C.,Harrap F. E. G.,Holmes M. R. J.

Abstract

1. Between 1955 and 1961 nineteen experiments were carried out on Majestic potatoes in various parts of England comparing muriate and sulphate of potash at three rates of application, in the range 75–336 lb./acre of K2O. Most of the experiments were on light soils.2. Total yield of tubers was on average the same from both sources at all rates of application, and this similarity was not affected by environmental conditions.3. Muriate of potash consistently gave a higher yield of large tubers than sulphate, with an average difference of 0·6 ton/acre. Conversely, muriate gave a lower yield of medium tubers than sulphate, again with a mean difference of 0·6 ton/acre.4. Muriate of potash significantly depressed tuber dry-matter content in eleven of the experiments, particularly at the higher rates, while sulphate had this effect in three experiments. Muriate gave a small increment in two experiments, at low rates only, while sulphate had this effect in five, most markedly at low rates. Sulphate gave a higher dry-matter content than muriate in most of the experiments. The mean difference was 1·0% at 300 and 336 lb./acre of K2O and 0·4 to 0·5% at lower rates.5. Sulphate of potash gave a more floury texture to the boiled tubers than muriate in three experiments, but otherwise no difference in texture was detected between the sources.6. The degree of off-flavour was not appreciably affected by rate or source of applied potash.7. After-cooking blackening was more marked at low than at high rates of applied potash in seven of the nineteen experiments. Muriate and sulphate of potash had similar effects.8. Farmyard manure ploughed down in winter was tested in three experiments and did not influence to any important extent the relative effects of muriate and sulphate of potash on tuber yield and quality.9. Application of the two sources on the flat before ridging and in the open drills was compared in the same three experiments, but did not alter the relative effects of the sources on yield or dry-matter content.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Genetics,Agronomy and Crop Science,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference7 articles.

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3