Author:
Peruzzi Andrea,Ginanni Marco,Fontanelli Marco,Raffaelli Michele,Bàrberi Paolo
Abstract
AbstractWeed management is often the most troublesome technical problem to be solved in organic farming, especially in poorly competitive crops like vegetables. A four-year (2000–2003) series of trials was established to assess the possibility of adopting an innovative non-chemical weed management system in organic carrot grown on the Fucino plateau, i.e., the most important carrot-growing area in Italy. The system utilized for physical weed control was based first on a false seedbed technique followed by pre-sowing weed removal, performed with a special 2 m wide 6-row spring-tine harrow. Prior to crop emergence, a pass with a flame weeder equipped with four 50 cm wide-open flame burners was also performed. Post-emergence weed control consisted of one or more hoeing passes with a purpose-designed 11-tine precision hoe equipped with spring implements (torsion weeders and vibrating tines), in addition to hand weeding. This innovative system was applied to a novel planting pattern (sowing in ten individual rows within 2 m wide beds) and compared to the standard management system of the area (sowing within 2 m wide beds but in five bands, use of spring-tine harrowing and flame weeding pre-emergence and of traditional hoeing post-emergence). The new system was tested in different commercial farms including both early and late-sown carrot. Assessments included machine operative characteristics, labor time, weed density and biomass, crop root yield and yield quality, and economic data (physical weed control costs and crop gross margin). Compared to the standard system, the innovative system usually resulted in reduced labor time (from 28 to 40%) and total costs for physical weed control (on average −416 € ha−1). Use of the precision hoe resulted in intra-row weed reduction ranging from 65 to 90%, which also led to a marked reduction in the labor required for hand weeding. In 2001 the two systems did not differ in terms of yield and yield quality, whereas in 2002 and 2003 the innovative system showed a higher mean density of carrot plants (from 28 to 55%), root yield (from 30 to 42%), and gross margin (from 40 to 100%). Carrot yield was higher in farms which adopted an early sowing whereas root commercial quality was somewhat variable between systems and years. In general, results obtained with the innovative management system look very promising.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science,Food Science
Reference34 articles.
1. 3 Melander B. , Heisel T. , and Jørgensen M.H. 2002. Band-steaming for intra-row weed control. Proceedings of 5th EWRS Workshop on Physical and Cultural Weed Control, Pisa, Italy. p. 216–219.
2. 12 Fogelberg F. 1998. Physical weed control—intra-row brush weeding and photocontrol in carrots. PhD Dissertation. Department of Agricultural Engineering, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp.
3. Weed management in organic agriculture: are we addressing the right issues?
4. 15 Radics L. , Gàl I. , and Pusztai P. 2002. Different combinations of weed management methods in organic carrot. Proceedings of 5th EWRS Workshop on Physical and Cultural Weed Control, Pisa, Italy. p. 137–146.
5. Resistance against uprooting in carrots (
Daucus carota
) and annual weeds: a basis for selective mechanical weed control
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献