Author:
Robinson Isabel,Nohle Ellen
Abstract
AbstractDuring an armed conflict, the use of explosive weapons with wide area effects in populated areas has a devastating impact on civilians. Less visible than the direct effects of explosive weapons, but equally devastating, are the reverberating effects of the use of explosive weapons in populated areas. While there is growing consensus that parties to an armed conflict are legally obliged to take into account the reasonably foreseeable reverberating effects of an attack, particularly for the purposes of the rules on proportionality and precautions in attack, the precise scope of this obligation remains unclear. After setting out the legal arguments in support of the position that reasonably foreseeable reverberating effects must be taken into account, this article goes on to examine how such effects should be evaluated and how they must be avoided or minimized.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference48 articles.
1. Collateral Damage on the 21st Century Battlefield: Enemy Exploitation of the Law of Armed Conflict and the Struggle for a Moral High Ground;Reynolds;Air Force Law Review,2005
2. Missiles over Kosovo: Emergence, Lex Lata, of a Customary Norm Requiring the Use of Precision Munitions in Urban Areas;Belt;Naval Law Review,2000
3. The human costs and legal consequences of nuclear weapons under international humanitarian law
4. The Principle of Discrimination in 21st Century Warfare;Schmitt;Yale Human Rights and Development Journal,1999
5. Rewired warfare: rethinking the law of cyber attack
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献