Author:
Seshia Shashi S.,Young G. Bryan
Abstract
Abstract:The evidence-based medicine (EBM) paradigm, introduced in 1992, has had a major and positive impact on all aspects of health care. However, widespread use has also uncovered some limitations; these are discussed from the perspectives of two clinicians in this, the first of a two part narrative review. For example, there are credible reservations about the validity of hierarchical levels of evidence, a core element of the EBM paradigm. In addition, potential and actual methodological and statistical deficiencies have been identified, not only in many published randomized controlled trials but also in systematic reviews, both rated highly for evidence in EBM classifications. Ethical violations compromise reliability of some data. Clinicians need to be conscious of potential limitations in some of the cornerstones of the EBM paradigm, and to deficiencies in the literature.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Neurology (clinical),Neurology,General Medicine
Reference144 articles.
1. Basic statistics for clinicians: 2. Interpreting study results: confidence intervals;Guyatt;CMAJ,1995
2. Medical Ethics and Controlled Trials
3. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford. Oxford, UK. [Cited 2012 Dec 12]. Available from: http://www.cebm.net/
4. Rosiglitazone, marketing, and medical science
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献