The Party-Line Pandemic: A Closer Look at the Partisan Response to COVID-19

Author:

Camobreco John F.ORCID,He ZhaochenORCID

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe response to the coronavirus pandemic in the United States has shown that even a serious public health crisis cannot escape the lens of partisanship. The literature shows that most Republicans have viewed the coronavirus as less serious than their Democratic counterparts. This study demonstrates that this partisan gap extends to the real behavior of the public during, and after, the coronavirus state lockdowns. Using location data from mobile phones, we find that county-level partisanship predicts compliance with state shutdown orders, even when controlling for local COVID-19 intensity. Further, the magnitude of this effect is stronger than that of other explanatory variables, such as age, education, and population density. These results show that partisan beliefs can affect behavior regarding issues that are not overtly political, even behaviors that could put one or others at risk.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference21 articles.

1. Beauchamp, Zack . 2020. “How Polarization Shaped Americans’ Responses to Coronavirus, in One Chart.” Vox, March 23. www.vox.com/2020/3/23/21190997/coronavirus-COVID-19-trump-polarization-data.

2. Funk, Cary , and Tyson, Alec . 2020. “Partisan Differences over the Pandemic Response Are Growing.” Scientific American, May 30. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/partisan-differences-over-the-pandemic-response-are-growing.

3. Flynn, Meghan , and Iati, Marisa . 2020. “Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp Sues Atlanta over Mask Requirement as Coronavirus Surges in the State.” Washington Post, July 16. www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/07/16/kemp-georgia-mask-mandates.

4. Polarization and Public Health: Partisan Differences in Social Distancing during the Coronavirus Pandemic

5. Seven Letter Insight. 2020. “2020 Voter Priorities Survey.” www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-f4af-d692-a975-fcff0b650000.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3