Rationalization of the scope of work: evaluation of imbalances and opportunities of multi-tasking

Author:

Hamid Algamir,Ricopuerto Jenny,Sanson Kenneth

Abstract

The purpose of this undertaking was to determine the imbalances and opportunities of multitasking of teachers in their workplace. Teachers have one of the most important jobs in the world. They fill in the shoes of too many different professions like a parent, disciplinarian, judge, administrator, academic experts, mentor, and more, and probably all-time. It’s no secret that our teachers get so many things done that it’s no wonder that they’ve become experts in multitasking. This study evaluates the imbalances and opportunities of multitasking of 60 teachers handled general education and major subject. Purposive surveys a descriptive quantitative and qualitative method was applied survey and interviews will be conducted; to rationalize the scope of work, were employed as research instruments to collect responses on imbalances and opportunities of multitasking. The research findings showed the majority of teachers strongly agreed with the opportunities of multitasking in terms of Integration of Diverse Work, and imparting knowledge to co-instructor. It further revealed that most of the respondents that practice multitasks were men. To divert the emphasis on the imbalances of multitasking, the administration should be able to motivate instructor in terms of giving honoraria to those who extend their working hours and acknowledging them also during the ceremonial events.

Publisher

Stratworks Research Incorporated

Reference16 articles.

1. Gautier, A., & Wauthy, X. (2007). European Economic Review. Elsevier.

2. Formal and Real Authority in Organizations

3. Doble, B. W., & Woodgett, J. R. (2003). Journal of cell science. journals.biologists.com.

4. Wright, C. (2009). The right way to multitask. Retrieved from com/personal-growth/the-right-way-to-multitask

5. Rosen, C. (2008). The New Atlantis. JSTOR.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3