Abstract
Nations struggled to decide when and how to end COVID-19 inspired lockdowns, with sharply divergent views between those arguing for a resumption of economic activity and those arguing for continuing the lockdown in some form. We examine the choice between continuing or ending a full lockdown within a simple optimal control model that encompasses both health and economic outcomes, and pays particular attention to when need for care exceeds hospital capacity. The model shows that very different strategies can perform similarly well and even both be optimal for the same relative valuation on work and life because of the presence of a so-called Skiba threshold. Qualitatively the alternate strategies correspond to trying essentially to eradicate the virus or merely to flatten the curve so fewer people urgently need healthcare when hospitals are already filled to capacity.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference26 articles.
1. Baker Scott R. and Bloom, Nicholas and Davis Steven J. and Kost Kyle and Sammon Marco and Viratyosin Tasaneeya. The unprecedented stock market reaction to COVID-19 The Review of Asset Pricing Studies; 2020.
2. Optimal Control of Nonlinear Processes
3. Layard Richard and Clark Andrew E. and De Neve Jan-Emmanuel and Krekel Christian and Fancourt Daisy and Hey et al, Gus When to release the lockdown? A wellbeing framework for analysing costs and benefits. IZA Institute of Labor Economics, IZA DP No. 13186; 2020.
4. Bloom David E and Kuhn Michael and Prettner Klaus Modern invectious disease: Macroeconomic impacts and policy responses Journal of Economic Lieterature; 2020.
5. Brodeur Abel and Gray David M. and Islam Anik and Bhuiyan Suraiya A Literature Review of the Economics of COVID-19. IZA Discussion paper No. 13411; 2020
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献