Non-adherence to self-care and associated factors among diabetes adult population in Ethiopian: A systemic review with meta-analysis

Author:

Abate Teshager WeldegiorgisORCID,Dessie Getenet,Workineh Yinager,Gedamu Haileyesus,Birhanu MinyichilORCID,Ayalew Emiru,Tirfie Mulat,Endalamaw AkliluORCID

Abstract

Background Self-care practice among people with diabetes is not well-implemented in Ethiopia. So far, in Ethiopia, several observational studies have been done on self-care practice and its determinants in people with diabetes. However, a comprehensive review that would have a lot of strong evidence for designing intervention is lacking. So, this review with a meta-analysis was conducted to bridge this gap. Methods A systematic review of an observational study is conducted following the PRISMA checklist. Three reviewers have been searched and extracted from the World Health Organization’s Hinari portal (SCOPUS, African Index Medicus, and African Journals Online databases), PubMed, Google Scholar and EMBASE. Articles’ quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale by two independent reviewers, and only studies with low and moderate risk were included in the final analysis. The review presented the pooled proportion of non-adherence to self-care practice in people with diabetes and the odds ratios of risk factors hindering to self-care practice after checking for heterogeneity and publication bias. The review has been registered in PROSPERO with protocol number CRD 42020149478. Results We included 21 primary studies (with 7,134 participants) in this meta-analysis. The pooled proportion of non-adherence to self-care in the diabetes population was 49.91 (95% CI: 44.73–55.08, I2 = 89.8%). Male (Pooled Odds Ratio (POR): 1.84 95%CI; 1.04–2.64, I2 = 15.0%), having private glucometer (POR: 2.71; 95%CI: 1.46–3.95, I2 = 0.0%), short-term Diabetes Mellitus (DM) duration (POR: 3.69; 95%CI: 1.86–5.52, I2 = 0.0%), DM complication (POR: 2.22; 95%CI: 1.48–2.95, I2 = 0.0%), treatment satisfaction (POR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.15–2.44, I2 = 0.0%), received diabetes self-management education (POR: 2.71; 95% CI: 1.46–3.95, I2 = 0.0%) and poor self-efficacy (POR: 3.09; 95% CI: 1.70–4.48, I2 = 0.0%) were statistically significant factors of non-adherence to self-care practice. Conclusions The overall pooled proportion of non-adherence to self-care among adult diabetes in Ethiopia was high. Further works would be needed to improve self-care practice in the diabetes population. So, factors that were identified might help to revise the plan set by the country, and further research might be required to health facility fidelity and each domain of self-care practice according to diabetes self-management guideline.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference125 articles.

1. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2019 abridged for primary care providers;ADA;Diabetes JC,2019

2. Organization WWH. Global report on diabetes. 2016.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3