“Taking action” to reduce pain—Has interpretation of the motor adaptation to pain been too simplistic?

Abstract

Movement adapts during acute pain. This is assumed to reduce nociceptive input, but the interpretation may not be straightforward. We investigated whether movement adaptation during pain reflects a purposeful search for a less painful solution. Three groups of participants performed two blocks (Baseline, Experimental) of wrist movements in the radial-ulnar direction. For the Control group (n = 10) both blocks were painfree. In two groups, painful electrical stimulation was applied at the elbow in Experimental conditions when the wrist crossed radial-ulnar neutral. Different stimulus intensities were given for specific wrist angles in a secondary direction (flexion-extension) as the wrist passed radial-ulnar neutral (Pain 5–1 group:painful stimulation at ~5 or ~1/10—n = 21; Pain 5–0 group:~5 or 0(no stimulation)/10—n = 6)). Participants were not informed about the less painful alternative and could use any strategy. We recorded the percentage of movements using the wrist flexion/extension alignment that evoked the lower intensity noxious stimulus, movement variability, and change in wrist/forearm alignment during pain. Participants adapted their strategy of wrist movement during pain provocation and reported less pain over time. Three adaptations of wrist movement were observed; (i) greater use of the wrist alignment with no/less noxious input (Pain 5–1, n = 8/21; Pain 5–0, n = 2/6); (ii) small (n = 9/21; n = 3/6) or (iii) large (n = 4/21; n = 1/6) change of wrist/forearm alignment to a region that was not allocated to provide an actual reduction in noxious stimulus. Pain reduction was achieved with “taking action” to relieve pain and did not depend on reduced noxious stimulus.