Non-COVID outcomes associated with the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic effects study (COPES): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Lau Vincent IssacORCID,Dhanoa Sumeet,Cheema Harleen,Lewis KimberleyORCID,Geeraert Patrick,Lu David,Merrick Benjamin,Vander Leek Aaron,Sebastianski Meghan,Kula Brittany,Chaudhuri Dipayan,Agarwal Arnav,Niven Daniel J.,Fiest Kirsten M.,Stelfox Henry T.,Zuege Danny J.,Rewa Oleksa G.,Bagshaw Sean M.

Abstract

Background As the Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues, healthcare providers struggle to manage both COVID-19 and non-COVID patients while still providing high-quality care. We conducted a systematic review/meta-analysis to describe the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with non-COVID illness and on healthcare systems compared to non-pandemic epochs. Methods We searched Ovid MEDLINE/EMBASE/Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews/CENTRAL/CINAHL (inception to December 31, 2020). All study types with COVID-pandemic time period (after December 31, 2019) with comparative non-pandemic time periods (prior to December 31, 2019). Data regarding study characteristics/case-mix/interventions/comparators/ outcomes (primary: mortality; secondary: morbidity/hospitalizations/disruptions-to-care. Paired reviewers conducted screening and abstraction, with conflicts resolved by discussion. Effect sizes for specific therapies were pooled using random-effects models. Risk of bias was assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, with evidence rating using GRADE methodology. Results Of 11,581 citations, 167 studies met eligibility. Our meta-analysis showed an increased mortality of 16% during the COVID pandemic for non-COVID illness compared with 11% mortality during the pre-pandemic period (RR 1.38, 95% CI: 1.28–1.50; absolute risk difference: 5% [95% CI: 4–6%], p<0.00001, very low certainty evidence). Twenty-eight studies (17%) reported significant changes in morbidity (where 93% reported increases), while 30 studies (18%) reported no significant change (very low certainty). Thirty-nine studies (23%) reported significant changes in hospitalizations (97% reporting decreases), while 111 studies (66%) reported no significant change (very low certainty). Sixty-two studies (37%) reported significant disruptions in standards-to-care (73% reporting increases), while 62 studies (37%) reported no significant change (very low certainty). Conclusions There was a significant increase in mortality during the COVID pandemic compared to pre-pandemic times for non-COVID illnesses. When significant changes were reported, there was increased morbidity, decreased hospitalizations and increased disruptions in standards-of-care. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020201256 (Sept 2, 2020).

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference199 articles.

1. COVID-19 Map. Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resour. Cent. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html (accessed 27 Jul 2020).

2. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report—22 June 2021 (Edition 45).;World Health Organization

3. Disruption of healthcare: Will the COVID pandemic worsen non-COVID outcomes and disease outbreaks?;P Barach;Prog Pediatr Cardiol,2020

4. Projecting hospital utilization during the COVID-19 outbreaks in the United States;SM Moghadas;Proc Natl Acad Sci,2020

5. Effect of widespread restrictions on the use of hospital services during an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome;MJ Schull;CMAJ Can Med Assoc J J Assoc Medicale Can,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3