Abstract
The resilience and vulnerability of airport networks are significant challenges during the COVID-19 global pandemic. Previous studies considered node failure of networks under natural disasters and extreme weather. Herein, we propose a complex network methodology combined with data-driven to assess the resilience of airport networks toward global-scale disturbance using the Chinese airport network (CAN) and the European airport network (EAN) as a case study. The assessment framework includes vulnerability and resilience analyses from the network- and node-level perspectives. Subsequently, we apply the framework to analyze the airport networks in China and Europe. Specifically, real air traffic data for 232 airports in China and 82 airports in Europe are selected to form the CAN and EAN, respectively. The complex network analysis reveals that the CAN and the EAN are scale-free small-world networks, that are resilient to random attacks. However, the connectivity and vulnerability of the CAN are inferior to those of the EAN. In addition, we select the passenger throughput from the top-50 airports in China and Europe to perform a comparative analysis. By comparing the resilience evaluation of individual airports, we discovered that the factors of resilience assessment of an airport network for global disturbance considers the network metrics and the effect of government policy in actual operations. Additionally, this study also proves that a country’s emergency response-ability towards the COVID-19 has a significantly affectes the recovery of its airport network.
Funder
The Chinese college Production,innovation Funding
the Civil Aviation Authority Security Capacity Building Funding Project
The special foundation for Local government Science and Technology Development of China
Sichuan Science and Technology Project
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference35 articles.
1. Reprint of “Modelling the resilience, friability and costs of an air tran-sport network affected by a large-scale disruptive event”;M. Janić;Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,2015
2. Resilience and stability of ecological systems;CS Holling;Annual review of ecol-ogy and systematics,1973
3. Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering;DD Woods;Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2015
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献