Abstract
The need for resilient health systems is recognized as important for the attainment of health outcomes, given the current shocks to health services. Resilience has been defined as the capacity to “prepare and effectively respond to crises; maintain core functions; and, informed by lessons learnt, reorganize if conditions require it”. There is however a recognized dichotomy between its conceptualization in literature, and its application in practice. We propose two mutually reinforcing categories of resilience, representing resilience targeted at potentially known shocks, and the inherent health system resilience, needed to respond to unpredictable shock events. We determined capacities for each of these categories, and explored this methodological proposition by computing country-specific scores against each capacity, for the 47 Member States of the WHO African Region. We assessed face validity of the computed index, to ensure derived values were representative of the different elements of resilience, and were predictive of health outcomes, and computed bias-corrected non-parametric confidence intervals of the emergency preparedness and response (EPR) and inherent system resilience (ISR) sub-indices, as well as the overall resilience index, using 1000 bootstrap replicates. We also explored the internal consistency and scale reliability of the index, by calculating Cronbach alphas for the various proposed capacities and their corresponding attributes. We computed overall resilience to be 48.4 out of a possible 100 in the 47 assessed countries, with generally lower levels of ISR. For ISR, the capacities were weakest for transformation capacity, followed by mobilization of resources, awareness of own capacities, self-regulation and finally diversity of services respectively. This paper aims to contribute to the growing body of empirical evidence on health systems and service resilience, which is of great importance to the functionality and performance of health systems, particularly in the context of COVID-19. It provides a methodological reflection for monitoring health system resilience, revealing areas of improvement in the provision of essential health services during shock events, and builds a case for the need for mechanisms, at country level, that address both specific and non-specific shocks to the health system, ultimately for the attainment of improved health outcomes.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference62 articles.
1. WHO Position Paper: Building health systems resilience for universal health coverage and health security during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Geneva, Switzerland:: World Health Organization 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-UHL-PHC-SP-2021.01
2. Effects of the West Africa Ebola Virus Disease on Health-Care Utilization—A Systematic Review;KJ Brolin Ribacke;Front Public Health,2016
3. Utilization of non-Ebola health care services during Ebola outbreaks: a systematic review and meta-analysis;JA Wilhelm;J Glob Health,2019
4. Fukushima after the Great East Japan Earthquake: lessons for developing responsive and resilient health systems;S Fukuma;J Glob Health,2017
5. Counting indirect crisis-related deaths in the context of a low-resilience health system: the case of maternal and neonatal health during the Ebola epidemic in Sierra Leone;L Sochas;Health Policy Plan,2017