Abstract
Nondisclosure of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, asexual, or otherwise queer (LGBTQA) identities in the workplace is both common and stressful to those who do not disclose. However, we lack direct evidence that nondisclosure of LGBTQA identity affects worker productivity. In two surveys of LGBTQA-identified scientists, we found that those who did not disclose LGBTQA identities in professional settings authored fewer peer-reviewed publications—a concrete productivity cost. In the second survey, which included straight and cisgender participants as a comparison group, we found that LGBTQA participants who disclosed their sexual orientation had publication counts more like non-LGBTQA participants than those who did not disclose, and that all three groups had similar time since first publication given their academic career stage. These results are most consistent with a productivity cost to nondisclosure of LGBTQA identity in professional settings, and suggest a concrete need to improve scientific workplace climates for sexual and gender minorities.
Funder
Division of Environmental Biology
California State University, Northridge
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference60 articles.
1. Queer in STEM: Workplace experiences reported in a national survey of LGBTQA individuals in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers;JB Yoder;J Homosex,2016
2. Coming out: The experience of LGBT+ people in STEM;B Barres;Genome Biology,2017
3. Developmental stages of the coming out process;E. Coleman;J Homosex,1982
4. The coming-out process and Its adaptational and health-related associations among gay, lesbian, and bisexual youths: Stipulation and exploration of a model;M Rosario;Am J Community Psychol,2001
5. Coming out in class: Challenges and benefits of active learning in a biology classroom for LGBTQIA students;KM Cooper;CBE Life Sci Educ,2016
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献