Abstract
Introduction
Shared decision making (SDM) refers to patients and health care professionals working together to reach a decision about treatment/care. In abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treatment options are influenced by patients’ clinical characteristics, their preferences, and potential trade-offs between alternative interventions. This is a prime example of where SDM is essential to ensure the right decision is made for the right patient, yet we have little understanding of what happens in practice. This study explored patient experiences to understand SDM practice in AAA surgery.
Methods
We used a qualitative approach to describe, and identify improvements to, current treatment decision making in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery. Two groups of patients were interviewed: those at the point of discussing treatment options (with corresponding digitally recorded consultation data) and following surgical intervention from one hospital. Framework analysis was used.
Results
Fifteen patients were interviewed, seven at the point of discussing treatment options and eight following surgical intervention. Timing, format and sources of information, verbal framing of interventions and level of patient engagement were key themes. Four areas for improvement were identified: earlier provision and more detailed written information along with signposting to quality on-line information; both intervention options, risks, benefits, and consequences, were not always discussed; some clinicians were somewhat directive in the decision-making process; and patients’ treatment values/preferences were not explored–the only example was in one of the eight recorded consultations. Patients could feel overwhelmed by the information and decision and fearful of the impending surgery.
Conclusions
More emphasis should be placed on the provision of full information and the exploration of patient values and preferences for treatment. Clinician training and support for patients, including decision aids, could facilitate the decision-making process. Providing written information earlier and guidance on reliable on-line resources would benefits patients and their families.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference32 articles.
1. Gender differences in abdominal aortic aneurysm presentation, repair, and mortality in the Vascular Study Group of New England;RC Lo;J Vasc Surg,2013
2. NHS England. Shared decision making. https://www.england.nhs.uk/shared-decision-making/ [accessed 26 November 2021].
3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Shared decision making. NICE guideline. Published 17 June 2021. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng197/resources/shared-decision-making-pdf-66142087186885 [Accessed 26 November 2021].
4. A three-talk model for shared decision making: multistage consultation process;G Elwyn;bmj,2017
5. Shared decision making and consent post-Montgomery, UK Supreme Court judgement supporting best practice;J Ward;Patient Educ Couns,2020