Abstract
Enhance performance in manufacturing carbon emission (MCE) reduction has become a widespread consensus and a necessary part, which cannot be achieved without the joint participation of manufacturing enterprises and supervisory departments. Accordingly, how to coordinate the interests of both sides and design a reasonable incentive-compatible mechanism becomes an urgent task at present. Considering the two subsidy funding channels of peer funds and government finance, this study applies the evolutionary game model to analyze feasible schemes for designing incentive-compatible mechanism of MCE supervision, discusses and simulates the realistic scenarios and influencing factors of incentive-compatible mechanism under the non-subsidized and subsidized schemes. The results show that MCE supervision is in an incentive-incompatible state under the non-subsidized incentive scheme, while in a constrained incentive-compatible state under the subsidized incentive scheme. With the increase of peer funds and penalty coefficient or the decrease of subsidy coefficient, the period of MCE supervision to reach an incentive-compatible state becomes shorter. However, a lower peer fund and penalty coefficient or a higher subsidy coefficient will contribute to a state of incentive-incompatible or a periodic cycle state of "incentive-compatible → incentive-incompatible →incentive-compatible→…" in the MCE supervision.
Funder
Anhui Office of Philosophy and Social Science
Scientific Research Foundation of Education Department of Anhui Province of China
Excellent Young Talents Fund Program of Higher Education Institutions of Anhui Province
Social Science Innovation and Development Research Program of Anhui Province
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference70 articles.
1. A review on carbon emission reduction in industries and planning emission limits;RK Sinha;Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,2019
2. Sustainability based performance evaluation of hybrid nanofluid assisted machining;AM Khan;Journal of Cleaner Production,2020
3. Greening manufacturing: Technology intensity and carbon dioxide emissions in developing countries;EK Avenyo;Applied Energy,2022
4. Digital transformation, external pressures and carbon performance in manufacturing companies;HH Deng;Zhejiang Social Sciences,2023
5. Retailers’ emissions reduction strategies under carbon trading policy: financing emissions reduction or technological emissions reduction;Q Lin;Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice,2023