Uncertainty in the association between socio-demographic characteristics and mental health

Author:

Rybnikova Nataliya,Broitman DaniORCID,Mary-Krause MurielleORCID,Melchior Maria,Ben-Haim Yakov

Abstract

Questionnaires are among the most basic and widespread tools to assess the mental health of a population in epidemiological and public health studies. Their most obvious advantage (firsthand self-report) is also the source of their main problems: the raw data requires interpretation, and are a snapshot of the specific sample’s status at a given time. Efforts to deal with both issues created a bi-dimensional space defined by two orthogonal axes, in which most of the quantitative mental health research can be located. Methods aimed to assure that mental health diagnoses are solidly grounded on existing raw data are part of the individual validity axis. Tools allowing the generalization of the results across the entire population compose the collective validity axis. This paper raises a different question. Since one goal of mental health assessments is to obtain results that can be generalized to some extent, an important question is how robust is a questionnaire result when applied to a different population or to the same population at a different time. In this case, there is deep uncertainty, without any a priori probabilistic information. The main claim of this paper is that this task requires the development of a new robustness to deep uncertainty axis, defining a three-dimensional research space. We demonstrate the analysis of deep uncertainty using the concept of robustness in info-gap decision theory. Based on data from questionnaires collected before and during the Covid-19 pandemic, we first locate a mental health assessment in the space defined by the individual validity axis and the collective validity axis. Then we develop a model of info-gap robustness to uncertainty in mental health assessment, showing how the robustness to deep uncertainty axis interacts with the other two axes, highlighting the contributions and the limitations of this approach. The ability to measure robustness to deep uncertainty in the mental health realm is important particularly in troubled and changing times. In this paper, we provide the basic methodological building blocks of the suggested approach using the outbreak of Covid-19 as a recent example.

Funder

Ministry of Science, Technology and Space

Ministère de l’Europe et des Affaires étrangères

Ministère de l'Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de l'Innovation

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference45 articles.

1. International comparability of health interview surveys: An overview of methods and approaches;M. Bullinger;BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH RESEARCH-COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES THEN IOS PRESS,2003

2. Cultural concepts of distress and psychiatric disorders: literature review and research recommendations for global mental health epidemiology;BA Kohrt;International journal of epidemiology,2014

3. Meltzer H. Development of a common instrument for mental health. In Nosikov A, Gudex C. Development of a common instrument for mental health. EUROHIS: Developing common instruments for health surveys. 2003;57:35.

4. Concordance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0 (CIDI 3.0) with standardized clinical assessments in the WHO World Mental Health surveys;JM Haro;International journal of methods in psychiatric research,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3