Abstract
Background
Intimate partner violence (IPV) disproportionately affects married women living with HIV (MWLHIV), resulting in undesirable human rights, socio-economic, mental, maternal, and child health consequences. Community Support systems against Violence (CoSaV) are widely available and promising public and voluntary resources for the prevention and mitigation of IPV but are poorly investigated. We set out to identify the predictors for the utilization of the CoSaV among the MWLHIV.
Methods
This was a quantitative cross-sectional study conducted among 424 consecutively sampled MWLHIV attending the Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) clinic at Kabale Regional Referral Hospital in southwestern Uganda in April 2021. Using an interviewer-administered questionnaire, data were collected on the participant’s socio-demographic characteristics, exposure to IPV, awareness about the CoSaV, perceptions about the quality, accessibility and challenges in accessing the CoSaV and the utilization. Modified Poisson regression model was used to identify the predictors for the utilization of CoSaV using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0.
Results
The mean age of the 424 participants in the study was 39.5 ± 10.2 years. More than half of the participants 51.9% (220/424) reported exposure to any IPV. Utilization of any CoSaV was found to be above average at 58.3% among the participants. The formal support (police, local government leaders, health workers and counselors) were more frequently utilized compared to the informal support (family, relatives and friends). Utilization of any CoSaV was higher among the women who were aware of the CoSaV and also those who were exposed to violence. Accessibility was identified as an independent predictor for utilization of any CoSaV.
Conclusions
Intimate partner violence (IPV) was prevalent among MWLHIV in southwestern Uganda. However, the utilization of any CoSaV was suboptimal. The formal CoSaV were more frequently utilized than the informal support systems. Accessibility was an independent predictor for utilization of any CoSaV. There is need to improve access in order to increase the utilization of the CoSaV and contribute to the attainment of sustainable development goal 5.2.1 and end violence against women.
Funder
Fogarty International Center (the U.S. Department of State’s Office of the U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator and Health Diplomacy [S/GAC]
President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief [PEPFAR]) of the National Institutes of Health
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference43 articles.
1. World report on violence and health;M. Daher;J. Med. Liban,2003
2. Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women in 2018;L. Sardinha;Lancet,2022
3. Correlates of intimate partner violence among married women in Uganda: a cross-sectional survey;D. Gubi;BMC Public Health,2020
4. Women living with HIV: Disclosure, violence, and social support;A. C. Gielen;J. Urban Heal,2000
5. The risks of partner violence following HIV status disclosure, and health service responses: Narratives of women attending reproductive health services in Kenya;M. Colombini;J. Int. AIDS Soc,2016