Abstract
Effective chronic disease management requires the active participation of patients, communities, and physicians. The objective of this study was to estimate the effectiveness of the Community-based Registration and Management for elderly patients with Hypertension or Type 2 Diabetes mellitus Project (CRMHDP) by using motivated primary care physicians and patients supported by prepared communities, to utilise healthcare and health outcomes in four cities in South Korea. We conducted a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study using 2010–2011 as the baseline years, alongside a follow-up period until 2015/2016, based on the Korean National Health Insurance database. Both a CRMHDP group (n = 46,865) and a control group (n = 93,730) were applied against healthcare utilisation and difference-in-differences estimations were performed. For the health outcome analysis, the intervention group (n = 27,242) and control group (n = 54,484) were analysed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression. Results: The difference-in-differences estimation of the average annual clinic visits per person and the average annual days covered were 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.13–1.39) and 22.97 (95% CI, 20.91–25.03), respectively, between the intervention and control groups. The adjusted hazard ratio for death in the intervention group, compared to the control group, was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.86–0.93). For stroke and chronic renal failure, the adjusted hazard ratios for the intervention group compared to the control group were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88–0.99) and 0.80 (95% CI 0.73–0.89), respectively. Our study suggests that for effective chronic disease management both elderly patients and physicians need to be motivated by community support.
Funder
GYEONGGI PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY INSTITUTE
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference38 articles.
1. Chronic illness management: what is the role of primary care?;AA Rothman,2003
2. Linking physicians’ pay to the quality of care—a major experiment in the United Kingdom;DJNEJM Martin Roland,2004
3. Provider pay-for-performance incentive programs: 2004 national study results;G Baker,2005
4. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness;T Bodenheimer,2002
5. A pay for performance scheme in primary care: Meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on the provider experiences of the quality and outcomes framework in the UK;N Khan,2020